پاورپوینت کامل Architecture Review Processes 31 اسلاید در PowerPoint

توجه : این فایل به صورت فایل power point (پاور پوینت) ارائه میگردد

 پاورپوینت کامل Architecture Review Processes 31 اسلاید در PowerPoint دارای ۳۱ اسلاید می باشد و دارای تنظیمات کامل در PowerPoint می باشد و آماده ارائه یا چاپ است

شما با استفاده ازاین پاورپوینت میتوانید یک ارائه بسیارعالی و با شکوهی داشته باشید و همه حاضرین با اشتیاق به مطالب شما گوش خواهند داد.

لطفا نگران مطالب داخل پاورپوینت نباشید، مطالب داخل اسلاید ها بسیار ساده و قابل درک برای شما می باشد، ما عالی بودن این فایل رو تضمین می کنیم.

توجه : در صورت  مشاهده  بهم ریختگی احتمالی در متون زیر ،دلیل ان کپی کردن این مطالب از داخل فایل می باشد و در فایل اصلی پاورپوینت کامل Architecture Review Processes 31 اسلاید در PowerPoint،به هیچ وجه بهم ریختگی وجود ندارد

بخشی از مطالب داخلی اسلاید ها

پاورپوینت کامل Architecture Review Processes 31 اسلاید در PowerPoint

اسلاید ۴: Things That Architects Don’t DoProcess compliance – that’s project officeEstimates – that’s service ownersHardware specifications – that’s EngineeringSoftware specifications – that’s DevelopersRequirement gathering – that’s Business AnalystsProcess description – that’s Business AnalystsWindows – that’s Building Maintenance

اسلاید ۵: Things That Architects Can DoPlan technology direction and set technology standardsHelp you figure out which technologies you should support.Review plans, designs and purchasesAssess how well a plan aligns with current direction and desired future positions.Identify opportunities to reuse components and services.Leverage enterprise contracts and license agreements.Integrate shared services where they might be cost-effective.Review business organization and business processesTechnical Architecture: align your technology plan with enterprise goals, business plans and business processes. Enterprise Architecture: align your business plans, business process and technology plan with your enterprise goals.

اسلاید ۶: Architecture ReviewsYou are about to sign off on the software architecture of a multimillion-dollar software-intensive system. What assurance do you have that the architectural decisions underpinning the design are the right ones to deliver a system that meets the required business goals Source: Software Architecture Review: The State of Practice Muhammad Ali Babar, Lero—the Irish Software Engineering Research Centre Ian Gorton, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory computer COMPUTING PRACTICES Published by the IEEE Computer Society 0018-9162/0 © ۲۰jj>

اسلاید ۷: Architecture ReviewsHow sure are you that the project will not be delayed through downstream rework—or even fail—due to inappropriate architectural choicesDo you know whether all system stakeholders have confidence in the proposed solution Are “best endeavors” a good enough basis for accepting an architectural designSource: Software Architecture Review: The State of Practice Muhammad Ali Babar, Lero—the Irish Software Engineering Research Centre Ian Gorton, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory computer COMPUTING PRACTICES Published by the IEEE Computer Society 0018-9162/0 © ۲۰jj>

اسلاید ۸: Architecture ReviewsArchitecture reviews are an effective way of ensuring design quality and addressing architectural concerns. The principal objectives of a software architecture review are to assess an architecture’s ability to deliver a system capable of fulfilling the quality requirements and to identify potential risks.11. P. Clements, R. Kazman, and M. Klein, Evaluating Software Architectures: Methods and Case Studies, Addison-Wesley, 2002.Source: Software Architecture Review: The State of Practice Muhammad Ali Babar, Lero—the Irish Software Engineering Research Centre Ian Gorton, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory computer COMPUTING PRACTICES Published by the IEEE Computer Society 0018-9162/0 © ۲۰jj>

اسلاید ۹: Benefits of Architecture ReviewIdentifying potential risks in the proposed architecture (88%)Assessing quality attributes (for example, scalability, performance) (77%)Identifying opportunities for reuse of artifacts and components (72%)Promoting good architecture design and evaluation practices (64%)Reducing project cost caused by undetected design problems (63%)Capturing the rationale for important design decisions (59%)Uncovering problems and conflicts in requirements (59%)Conforming to organization’s quality assurance process (55%)Assisting stakeholders in negotiating conflicting requirements (43%)Partitioning architectural design responsibilities (40%)Identifying skills required to implement the proposed architecture (40%)Improving architecture documentation quality (40%)Facilitating clear articulation of nonfunctional requirements (31%)Opening new communication channels among stakeholders (31%)Survey of benefits perceived from systems architecture among 86 responding organizations, from Software Architecture Review: The State of Practice by Muhammad Ali Babar, Lero—the Irish Software Engineering Research Centre and Ian Gorton, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, IEEE Computer July 20E 20p>

اسلاید ۱۰: Types of reviewProject process reviewsProject Initiation Review (Gate 1)Approve project goals, strategy, conceptIterative projects may propose how they will articulate architecture and designPlanning / Design Review (Gate 2)Approve project architecture, solution design, technology direct